What Really Happened at Bretton Woods?

Category: Blog

It didn’t get the headlines that the FBI’s recent discovery has created, but there was also a recent discovery in the Treasury Department.

The international monetary system created by Bretton Woods played a huge role in the post-World War II global economy. Even though the architecture changed with the end of the gold standard in the United States in 1971, the institutions set up by Bretton Woods still play a major role in the global economy and highlight the importance of global economic interdependence. A United States Treasury Department official has found new evidence that subtly changes our understanding of the genesis of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), two important agents in the modern global economy.

This discovery highlights the importance of critical thinking, analysis, and questioning about history. History can often appear stale and dry to students, in part because it feels distant, abstract, and static; this article offers a rare example of how the historical record can evolve with new evidence. The work of historians never stops, as new evidence about the past can uncover new perspectives and change our view of historical events.

While this new primary source does not dramatically alter our understanding of what happened at Bretton Woods, it offers a subtle shift that contributes to discussion on essential dilemmas at the heart of two of the lessons in the Understanding Fiscal Responsibility curriculum: Developing Nations and the IMF and Europe’s Debt Crisis. The first lesson asks whether developing nations should accept loans from the IMF, and the second asks when one country’s economic and financial crisis becomes everyone’s problem.

At a time when all of our fates are linked by international trade and finance, key questions that link all of these themes arise: To what extent are nations responsible for the economies of other nations? To what extent is it in their self-interest to support other economies? Does doing so threaten the autonomy of poorer countries, who may become beholden to their wealthy creditors?

Teachers can easily incorporate this article as an extension of the IMF or European Debt Crisis lessons, asking whether students’ impressions and understandings after these lessons change as a result of new historical evidence. Teachers can also lead a discussion about this article without going through the full lessons with some basic background about Bretton Woods and the IMF and World Bank. These discussions may take place in a unit about the aftermath of World War II or a lesson about current events in a civics, economics, or world history class. Specifically, teachers may want to ask:

  • To what extent does the new evidence reinforce students’ previous notions about international financial organizations?
  • The article says that the change in the historical record is subtle; what exactly is the shift?
  • How does this shift change students’ impression of the IMF and the World Bank, if at all?

Teachers may also wish to supplement this discussion with additional background on these organizations. One resource that provides a succinct overview of the Bretton Woods system is a brief history by TIME magazine.

Posted by Robert Shand

Posted by: | 0 Comments

Leave a Reply